RSS

Clearing muddy waters of credit amnesty

23 May

Johannesburg – The latest credit amnesty by the department of trade and industry was bound to be misinterpreted by the general public and companies alike, according to Marelize Uys, chief operations officer (COO) at Managed Integrity Evaluation (MIE).

She said there is mass confusion about credit amnesty.

“Some people are going as far as to think their debt was going to be wiped clean. Obviously this is not the case,” she said.

“What this regulation does entail is the once off removal of adverse consumer credit information and paid up judgements, as well as a continuous removal of paid up judgements.”

What is a “paid up judgement”?

This is any contrary court judgements relating to debt where the consumer has settled the capital amounts. In other words, where the consumer has paid off their debt.

“What this means in terms of credit amnesty is that previously debt settlement was listed as ‘paid in full’ for a certain period of time. Now it will not be listed at all, which is good for consumers who have dealt with previous debt,” said Uys.

What does “adverse credit consumer information” mean?

Sometimes people with debt would be officially labelled as “delinquent”, “slow paying”, “absconded”, or “not contactable”, to name a few.

These are usually subjective categorisations of consumer behaviours and do not always reflect the individuals themselves.

“With the new regulations, consumers will not have to live with these labels if they have in fact paid of their debt,” sayd Uys.

How does this credit amnesty impact the credit bureaus?

Credit bureaus must ensure that they have removed all adverse consumer information pertaining to the terms of the credit amnesty.

The adverse data may not be displayed or provided to any prospective employers requesting such information.

Does the credit amnesty mean that a consumer’s debt is absolved?

The credit amnesty does not mean that consumer’s credit obligation no longer exists.

It rather means that certain adverse records regarding the manner in which the consumer previously managed their obligations will no longer be held on the records of the credit bureaus.

“The credit amnesty seeks to create the incentive for consumers to repay their debt instead of naming and shaming people based on subjectivity,” said Uys.

Can employers still conduct credit checks on prospective employees?

Credit checks may be conducted within the recruitment process if the employer continues to abide by the regulations.

In the background screening industry a credit check can be requested for one of the following purposes:

– Employment in a position that requires trust and honesty and entails the handling of cash or finances;

– Verifying education qualifications and employment;

– Fraud detection and prevention services.

Companies looking to vet prospective employees will still be provided with adverse judgements listed against a consumer for debts that have not been settled.

“Additionally, previous employment history, address history and ID verification will also reflect on credit reports,” said Uys.

“This includes new adverse credit information and new judgements as well. So companies need not worry about credit amnesty’s impact on their vetting process.”

– Fin24

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 23/05/2014 in Content

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: